Partnerships BC says no to Expressway as toll road



Partnerships BC says no to Expressway as toll road

Partnerships BC says no to Expressway as toll road

Published on September 2nd, 2008
Published on March 8th, 2010
Robert Bay RSS Feed

Report does say maybe to possible private builder

The provincial government is taking a closer look at developing three major infrastructure projects by partnering with the private sector, but the Burnside Expressway isnt among them.

Topics :
Burnside , Sutherlands River , Antigonish

Burnside - The provincial government is taking a closer look at developing three major infrastructure projects by partnering with the private sector, but the Burnside Expressway isnt among them.

The province asked Partnerships BC to review 10 possible projects, including the Burnside Expressway, for their feasibility to be developed as strategic infrastructure partnerships or SIPs.

As a result of that study, the province will develop detailed business cases for proceeding with three projects as public-private partnerships: twinning the 104 Highway from Sutherlands River to the Canso Causeway; building new jails in Antigonish and Cumberland counties; and the development of a mobile radio system to be used by emergency personnel.

Partnerships BC felt that because [the Burnside Expressway] was a small project that it wouldnt be as effective as a strategic infrastructure partnership, says Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal Minister Murray Scott. The three were looking at were more manageable projects.

The report concludes that, since the proposed Expressway is a short stretch of highway within an existing road network, it would not be feasible as a design-build-finance-operate (DBFO) project (in other words, a toll road).

However, the report adds that if a private partner could be found to coordinate the design and construction processes the province might benefit from a design build (DB) approach.

The end result is that the province continues to be committed to building the Expressway, but how it will be paved is still an open question.

The Expressway being left off the short list doesnt mean that we still wont move ahead with the expressway as a strategic infrastructure partnership, Scott says. We have to decide if were going to do it on our own. If we do it ourselves, it will have to go into next years budget.

And while Scott said it was still too early to talk about a timeline for construction, some work is progressing on the proposed Expressway.

Pre-site selection and design are being evaluated, Scott says, adding that, as development continues in and around Burnside, the Expressway will take on even greater urgency.

There are other projects underway in Sackville, Bedford and other areas that will make Burnside and the traffic around there even more important. We know its very important to people in Burnside and its very important to us too, he says.

The government committed in its November 2007 throne speech to begin work on the Expressway in 2008, and reiterated the importance of the Expressway when Premier Rodney MacDonald outlined his vision of the Atlantic Gateway in April 2008.

-30-



Comments

  • Username
    Dez
    - March 9th, 2010 at 09:29:49

    I only pray that they select the option to align the new expressway towards, and into the existing interchange with the 101/102 at Bedford/Sackville, instead of opting only for the option which connects it to Duke/Glendale in the Bedford Industrial Park. Selecting the second option will mean all traffic from the new 107 expressway will need to go through the diamond interchange at Duke/Glendale in order to access highway 101 or Bedford. It makes far more sense to have the 101, 102, 107, 7 (Magazine Hill/Bedford Bypass), Highway 2 (Bedford Highway), and Highway 1 (Sackville Drive) all converging in one location at the existing Bedford/Sackville interchange. This interchange is also planned for big upgrades in the coming years.

    I believe I heard Mayor Kelly say he prefers the option of connecting the new expressway to Duke/Glendale (why am I not surprised). However I believe this would be shortsighted, and just plain wrong. I urge interested parties to fight for the better option.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Stephen
    - March 9th, 2010 at 09:29:49

    I still say it's a shame that Western Nova Scotia was not even a blimp on hte list of projects. This end of the province always gets the bad end of the stick - especially when it comes to upgraded roads.

    Trying driving from Shelburne to Liverpool on the twisty roads. If these were in any other part of the province they would have been upgraded by now.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Burnside News is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Ad Finder

May 17th 2012

View our Newspaper ads

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising